Criteria 1-Curricular Aspects
| # | Key indicator-1.1 Curricular Design and Development | Documents |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.1.1 Curricula developed and implemented have relevance to the local, national, regional and global developmental needs, which is reflected in the Programme outcomes (POs), and Course Outcomes(COs) of the Programmes offered by the University | Click here |
| 2 | 1.1.2 The Programmes offered by the institution focus on employability/ entrepreneurship/ skill development and their course syllabi are adequately revised to incorporate contemporary requirements | Click here |
| # | Key indicator-1.2 Academic Flexibility | Documents |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.2.1 Percentage of new courses introduced out of the total number of courses across all programmes offered during the last five years | Click here |
| # | Key indicator-1.3 Curriculum Enrichment | Documents |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.3.1 Institution integrates cross-cutting issues relevant to Professional Ethics, Gender, Human Values, Environment & Sustainability and other value framework enshrined in Sustainable Development goals and National Education Policy – 2020 into the Curriculum | Click here |
| 2 | 1.3.2 Number of certificate / value-added courses / Diploma Programmes offered by the institutions and online courses of MOOCs, SWAYAM/ e_Pathshala/ NPTEL and other recognized platforms where the students of the institution have enrolled and successfully completed during the last five years | Click here |
| 3 | 1.3.3 Percentage of Programmes that have components of field projects / research projects / internships during last five years Note: The term internship is inclusive of Industry Immersion practices | Click here |
| # | Key indicator-1.4 Feedback System | Documents |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.4.1 Structured feedback for curriculum and its transactions is regularly obtained from stakeholders like Students, Teachers, Employers, Alumni, Academic peers etc., and Feedback processes of the institution may be classified as follows: A. Feedback collected, analysed, action taken & communicated to relevant body and feedback hosted on the institutional website B. Feedback collected, analysed, action has been taken and communicated to the relevant body C. Feedback collected and analysed D. Feedback collected E. Feedback not collected | Click here |
Criteria 2- Teaching-learning and evaluation
| # | Key indicator-2.1 Student Enrolment and Profile | Documents |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.1.1 Enrollment Percentage | Click here |
| 2 | 2.1.2 Percentage of seats filled against reserved categories (SC, ST, OBC, etc.) as per applicable reservation policy for the first year admission year-wise during the last five years Note 1. Include only those reserved categories as specified by the State/Central Government orders for admission. 2. Only those seats filled against the quota should be counted here | Click here |
| # | Key indicator-2.2 Catering to Student Diversity | Documents |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.2.1 The institution assesses the learning levels of the students and organises special Programmes to cater to differential learning needs of the student | Click here |
| 2 | 2.2.2.Student - Full time teacher ratio (Data for the latest completed academic year) Note: A teacher employed for at least 90 per cent of the normal or statutory number of hours of work for a fulltime teacher (including contractual) over a complete academic year is classified as a full-time teacher . | Click here |
| # | Key indicator-2.3 Teaching and learning | Documents |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.3.1 Student centric methods, such as experiential learning, participative learning and problem solving methodologies are used for enhancing learning experience and teachers use ICT-enabled tools including online resources for effective teaching learning process | Click here |
| 2 | 2.3.2 The institution adopts effective Mentor-Mentee Schemes to address academics and student-psychological issues | Click here |
| # | Key indicator-2.4 Teacher Profile and Quality | Documents |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.4.1 Average percentage of full time teachers appointed against the number of sanctioned posts year wise during the last five years | Click here |
| 2 | 2.4.2 Percentage of full time teachers with Ph.D./D.M/M.Ch./D.N.B/ Superspeciality/L.L.D/D.S.C/D.Litt. during the last five years | Click here |
| 3 | 2.4.3 Average teaching experience of full time teachers (Data to be provided only for the latest completed academic year, in number of years) | Click here |
| # | Key indicator-2.5 Evaluation Process and Reforms | Documents |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.5.1 Average number of days from the date of last semester-end/ year- end examination till the last date of declaration of results year-wise during the last five years | Click here |
| 2 | 2.5.2 Percentage of student complaints/grievances about evaluation against total number of students appeared in the examinations during the last five years | Click here |
| 3 | 2.5.3 Status of automation of Examination division along with approved Examination Manual/ordinance A. 100% automation of entire division & implementation of Examination Management System (EMS) B. Only student registration, Hall ticket issue & Result Processing C. Only student registration and result processing D. Only result processing E. Only manual methodology | Click here |
| # | Key indicator-2.6 Student Performance and Learning Outcomes | Documents |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.6.1 The institution has stated learning outcomes (Program and Course outcomes)/graduate attributes which are integrated into the assessment process and widely publicized through the website and other documents and the attainment of the same are evaluated by the institution | Click here |
| 2 | 2.6.2 Pass percentage of students (excluding backlog students) (Data to be provided only for the latest completed academic year) | Click here |
| # | Key indicator-2.7 Student Satisfaction Survey | Documents |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.7.1 Online Student Satisfaction Survey regarding the teaching-learning process.( Online survey to be conducted) | Click here |
Criteria 3- Research,Inovation and Extension
| # | Key indicator-3.1 Promotion of Research and Facilities | Documents |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3.1.1 The institution’s Research facilities are frequently updated and there are well defined policy for promotion of research which is uploaded on the institutional website and implemented | Click here |
| 2 | 3.1.2 The institution provides seed money to its teachers for research (average per year; INR in Lakhs) | Click here |
| 3 | 3.1.3 Percentage of teachers receiving national/ international fellowship/financial support by various agencies for advanced studies/ research during the last five years | Click here |
| 4 | 3.1.4 Percentage of JRFs, SRFs among the enrolled PhD scholars in the institution during the last five years | Click here |
| # | Key indicator-3.2 Resource Mobilization for Research | Documents |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3.2.1 Research funding received by the institution and its faculties through Government and non-government sources such as industry, corporate houses, international bodies for research project, Endowment Research Chairs during the last five years (INR in Lakhs) | Click here |
| 2 | 3.2.2 Number of research projects per teacher funded by government, nongovernment , industry, corporate houses, international bodies during the last five years | Click here |
| # | Key indicator-3.3 Innovation Ecosystem | Documents |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3.3.1 Institution has created an ecosystem for innovations, Indian Knowledge System (IKS) including awareness about IPR, establishment of IPR cell, Incubation centre and other initiatives for the creation and transfer of technology/knowledge and the outcomes of the same are evident | Click here |
| 2 | 3.3.2 Number of awards received for research/innovations by the institution/teachers/research scholars/students during the last five years | Click here |
| # | Key indicator-3.4 Research Publications and Awards | Documents |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3.4.1 The institution ensures implementation of its stated Code of Ethics for research 3.4.1.1The institution has a stated Code of Ethics for research and the implementation of which is ensured through the following: 1. Inclusion of research ethics in the research methodology course work 2. Presence of institutional Ethics committees (Animal, chemical,bio-ethics etc.,) 3. Plagiarism check 4. Research Advisory Committee | Click here |
| 2 | 3.4.2 Number of Patents awarded during the last five years | Click here |
| 3 | 3.4.3 Number of Ph.Ds awarded per recognized guide during the last five years | Click here |
| 4 | 3.4.4 Number of research papers published per teacher in the Journals as notified on UGC CARE list during the last five years Note: The HEI should indicate in the data template against each paper about the presence of the paper in the UGC CARE Category wise list with care journal ID | Click here |
| 5 | 3.4.5 Number of books and chapters in edited volumes published per teacher during the last five years | Click here |
| 6 | 3.4.6 E-content is developed by teachers : 1. For e-PG-Pathshala 2. For CEC (Undergraduate) 3. For SWAYAM 4. For other MOOCs platforms 5. Any other Government Initiatives 6. For Institutional LMS | Click here |
| 7 | 3.4.7 Bibliometrics of the publications during the last five years based on average Citation Index in Scopus/ Web of Science | Click here |
| 8 | 3.4.8 Bibliometrics of the publications during the last five years based on Scopus/ Web of Science – h-Index of the University | Click here |
| # | Key indicator-3.5 Consultancy | Documents |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3.5.1 Revenue generated from consultancy and corporate training during the last five years (INR in Lakhs) | Click here |
| # | Key indicator-3.6 Extension Activities | Documents |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3.6.1 Outcomes of extension activities in the neighborhood community in terms of impact and sensitizing the students to social issues and holistic development, and awards received if any during the last five years (Showcase at least four case studies to the peer team) | Click here |
| 2 | 3.6.2 Number of extension and outreach programs conducted by the institution through organized forums like NSS/NCC with involvement of community year wise during the last five years | Click here |
| # | Key indicator-3.7 Collaboration | Documents |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3.7.1 Number of functional MoUs /linkage with institutions/ industries in India and abroad for internship, on-the-job training, project work, student / faculty exchange and collaborative research during the last five years | Click here |
Criteria 4- Infrastructure and Learning resource
| # | Key indicator-4.1 Physical Facilities | Documents |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.1.1 The institution has adequate infrastructure facilities for a. teaching - learning. viz., classrooms, laboratories, b. ICT enabled facilities such as smart classes, LMS etc. c. Facilities for cultural and sports activities , yoga centre, games (indoor and outdoor) gymnasium, auditorium etc. | Click here |
| 2 | 4.1.2 Percentage of expenditure excluding salary, for infrastructure development and augmentation year wise during the last five years (INR in Lakhs) | Click here |
| # | Key indicator-4.2 Library as a Learning Resource | Documents |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.2.1 Library is automated with digital facilities using Integrated Library Management System (ILMS), adequate subscription to e-resources and journals are made. The library is optimally used by the faculty and students | Click here |
| 2 | 4.2.2 Percentage expenditure for purchase of books/ e-books and subscription to journals/e-journals during the last five years (INR in Lakhs) | Click here |
| # | Key indicator-4.3 IT Infrastructure | Documents |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.3.1 Institution frequently updates its IT facilities and provides sufficient bandwidth for internet connection | Click here |
| 2 | 4.3.2 Student - Computer ratio (Data for the latest completed academic year) | Click here |
| 3 | 4.3.3 Institution has the following Facilities for e-content and other resource development 1. Audio visual center, mixing equipment, editing facilities and Media Studio 2. Lecture Capturing System(LCS) 3. Central Instrumentation Centre 4. Animal House 5. Museum 6. Business Lab 7. Research/statistical database 8. Moot court 9. Theatre 10. Art Gallery 11. Any other facility to support research | Click here |
| # | Key indicator-4.4 Maintenance of Campus Infrastructure | Documents |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.4.1 Percentage expenditure incurred on maintenance of physical facilities and academic support facilities excluding salary component during the last five years | Click here |
| 2 | 4.4.2 There are established systems and procedures for maintaining and utilising physical, academic and support facilities - laboratory,library, sports complex, computers, classrooms etc. | Click here |
Criteria 5- Student,Support and progression
| # | Key indicator-5.1 Student Support | Documents |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5.1.1 Percentage of students benefited by scholarships and freeships provided by the institution, Government and non-government bodies, industries, individuals, philanthropists during the last five years | Click here |
| 2 | 5.1.2 Efforts taken by the institution to provide career counseling including e-counseling and guidance for competitive examinations during the last five years | Click here |
| 3 | 5.1.3 Following Capacity development and skills enhancement initiatives are undertaken by the institution for 1. Soft skills 2. Language and communication skills 3. Life skills (Yoga, physical fitness, health and hygiene, selfemployment and entrepreneurial skills) 4. Awareness of trends in technology | Click here |
| 4 | 5.1.4.The Institution adopts the following for redressal of student grievances including sexual harassment and ragging cases 1. Implementation of guidelines of statutory/regulatory bodies 2. Organisation-wide awareness and undertakings on policies with zero tolerance 3. Mechanisms for submission of online/offline students’ grievances 4. Timely redressal of the grievances through appropriate committees | Click here |
| # | Key indicator-5.2 Student Progression | Documents |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5.2.1 Percentage of placement of outgoing students during the last five years | Click here |
| 2 | 5.2.2 Percentage of graduated students who have progressed to higher education year-wise during last five years | Click here |
| 3 | 5.2.3 Percentage of students qualifying in state/ national/ international level examinations out of the graduated students during the last five years (eg. SLET, NET, UPSC etc) | Click here |
| # | Key indicator-5.3 Student Participation and Activities | Documents |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5.3.1 Number of awards/medals won by students for outstanding performance in sports/cultural activities at inter-university/state/national/international events (award for a team event should be counted as one) during the last five years | Click here |
| 2 | 5.3.2 Presence of an active Student Council & representation of students on academic & administrative bodies/committees of the institution | Click here |
| 3 | 5.3.3 The institution conducts /organizes following activities 1. Sports competitions/events 2.Cultural competitions/events 3. Technical fest/academic fests 4. Any other events through active clubs and forums | Click here |
| # | Key indicator-5.4 Alumni Engagement | Documents |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5.4.1 Alumni contribution during the last five years to the University through registered Alumni Association | Click here |
| 2 | 5.4.2 Alumni contributes and engages significantly to the development of University through academic and other support system | Click here |
Criteria 6- Governance,Leadership and management
| # | Key indicator-6.1 Institutional Vision and Leadership | Documents |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6.1.1 The Institutional governance and leadership are in accordance with Vision and mission of the institution and it is visible in various institutional practices such as NEP implementation, sustained institutional growth, de-centralization, participation in the institutional governance and in their Short term and Long term institutional perspective plan. | Click here |
| # | Key indicator-6.2 Strategy Development and Deployment | Documents |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6.2.1 The institutional perspective plan is effectively deployed and functioning of the Institutional bodies are effective and efficient as visible from policies, administrative set-up, appointment, service rules, procedures etc. | Click here |
| 2 | 6.2.2 Institution Implements e-governance in its operations 6.2.2.1 e-governance is implemented covering the following areas of operations: 1. Administration including complaint management 2. Finance and Accounts 3. Student Admission and Support 4. Examinations | Click here |
| # | Key indicator-6.3 Faculty Empowerment Strategies | Documents |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6.3.1 The institution has performance appraisal system, effective welfare measures for teaching and non-teaching staff and avenues for career development/progression | Click here |
| 2 | 6.3.2 Percentage of teachers provided with financial support to attend conferences/workshops and towards membership fee of professional bodies during the last five years | Click here |
| 3 | 6.3.3 Percentage of teachers undergoing online/ face-to-face Faculty Development Programmes (FDP)/ Management Development Programs (MDP) during the last five years (Professional Development Programmes, Orientation/Induction Programmes, Refresher Course, Short Term Course ) Note: FDP less than 5 days will not be considered | Click here |
| # | Key indicator-6.4 Financial Management and Resource Mobilization | Documents |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6.4.1 Institutional strategies for mobilisation of funds other than salary and fees and the optimal utilisation of resources | Click here |
| 2 | 6.4.2 Funds / Grants received from government bodies/non government and philanthropists during the last five years for development and maintenance of infrastructure (not covered under Criteria III and V ) (INR in Lakhs) | Click here |
| 3 | 6.4.3 Institution regularly conducts internal and external financial audits | Click here |
| # | Key indicator-6.5 Internal Quality Assurance System (IQAS) | Documents |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6.5.1 Internal Quality Assurance Cell (IQAC)/ Internal Quality Assurance System (IQAS) has contributed significantly for institutionalizing the quality assurance strategies and processes, by constantly reviewing the teachinglearning process, structures & methodologies of operations and learning outcomes, at periodic intervals Internal Quality Assurance Cell (IQAC) has contributed significantly for institutionalizing the quality assurance strategies and processes visible in terms of – Incremental improvements made for the preceding five years with regard to quality (in case of first cycle) Incremental improvements made for the preceding five years with regard to quality and post accreditation quality initiatives (second and subsequent cycles) | Click here |
| 2 | 6.5.2 Institution has adopted the following for Quality assurance: 1. Academic and Administrative Audit (AAA) and follow up action taken 2.Conferences, Seminars, Workshops on quality conducted 3. Collaborative quality initiatives with other institution(s) 4.Orientation programme on quality issues for teachers and students 5. Participation in NIRF and other recognized ranking like Shanghai Ranking, QS Ranking Times Ranking etc 6.Any other quality audit recognized by state, national or international agencies | Click here |
| 3 | 6.5.3 Incremental improvements made for the preceding five years with regard to quality (in case of first cycle NAAC A/A) Post accreditation quality initiatives (second and subsequent cycles of NAAC A/A) | Click here |
Criteria 7- Institutional value and best practices
| # | Key indicator-7.1 Institutional Values and Social Responsibilities | Documents |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 7.1.1 Institution has initiated Gender audit and measure for the promotion of gender equity | Click here |
| 2 | 7.1.2 The Institution has facilities for alternate sources of energy and energy conservation measures | Click here |
| 3 | 7.1.3 Describe the facilities in the Institution for the management of the following types of degradable and non-degradable waste (within 500 words) Solid waste management Solid waste management Liquid waste management Biomedical waste management E-waste management Waste recycling system Hazardous chemicals and radioactive waste management | Click here |
| 4 | 7.1.4 Water conservation facilities available in the Institution 1. Rainwater harvesting 2. Borewell /Open well recharge 3. Construction of tanks and bunds 4. Wastewater recycling 5. Maintenance of water bodies and distribution system in the campus | Click here |
| 5 | 7.1.5 Green campus initiatives include | Click here |
| 6 | 7.1.6 Quality audits on environment and energy are regularly undertaken by the institution 7.1.6.1.The institutional environment and energy initiatives are confirmed through the following 1.Green audit /Environment audit 2. Energy audit 3.Clean and green campus initiatives 4. Beyond the campus environmental promotion and sustainability activities | Click here |
| 7 | 7.1.7 The Institution has Differently-abled (Divyangjan) friendly, barrier free environment | Click here |
| 8 | 7.1.8 Describe the Institutional efforts/initiatives in providing an inclusive environment i.e., tolerance and harmony towards cultural, regional, linguistic, communal, socio-economic and such other diversities (within 500 words). | Click here |
| 9 | 7.1.9 Sensitization of students and employees of the Institution to the constitutional obligations: values, rights, duties and responsibilities of citizens | Click here |
| 10 | 7.1.10 The Institution has a prescribed code of conduct for students, teachers, administrators and other staff and conducts periodic programmes in this regard. 1. The institutional Code of Conduct principles are displayed on the website 2. There is a committee to monitor adherence to the institutional Code of Conduct principles 3. Institution organizes professional ethics programmes for students, teachers, administrators and other staff 4. Annual awareness programmes on Code of Conduct are organized | Click here |
| # | Key indicator-7.2 Describe two Best practices successfully implemented. | Documents |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 7.2.1 Describe two Best practices successfully implemented by the Institution as per the NAAC format provided in the Manual. | Click here |
| # | Key indicator-7.3 Institutional Distinctiveness | Documents |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 7.3.1 Portray the performance of the Institution in one area distinctive to its priority and thrust within 1000 words | Click here |
-
- Page Visitors Count:
- Last Updated: December 6, 2024
- Site Statistics
- Page Visitors Count:
© This website belongs to UAS, Bangalore, Govt. of Karnataka, India – 560065
